The five reads
At a glance the decision-relevant reads, first
GLOBAL TAPE
No overseas listings — ORBS trades on its home exchange only.
Track record · free & ungated
We grade our price-band calls in public
Each forward price band is logged the day it's set and scored when it resolves — misses included. 5 bands have resolved so far — not yet enough for a hit-rate that would mean anything, so none is shown. This builds in the open, not behind the paywall.
12
bands logged
5
resolved so far
Building
status
The calibration ledger stays free, always — a track record can't sit behind a paywall.
Price action
Price & quote
Live quote refreshed every 15 minutes against the full daily snapshot.
The readUnder pressurefact
Where the price sits inside today's range and its 52-week range, plus how it's performed over time. This is the raw quote — the same number everywhere, just faster.
◆ Death cross◇ Ascending channel50-day sits below the 200-day — bearish long-term structure.
Drag or arrow-key the chart for daily OHLCV · 126 sessions through Aug 10, 2026 · prev close $0.73 (dashed) · live $0.72 hollow — not yet a settled bar
Open●
$0.71
Prev close●
$0.73
Volume●
3.65M
avg 17.99M
Rel. volume◐
0.20×
below normal
Market cap●
$276.85M
Shares out●
388.01M
float 269.57M
Day range
52-week range ◐
The QTick signal
QTick proprietary signal
A transparent point tally — bull evidence minus bear evidence — read over ~30 days. Faster factors time the swing; slower ones (quality, 13F, forensics) weigh in as longer-horizon context. A model-based prior, not advice.
~30-day swing read · graded vs S&Puncalibrated prior · track record buildingstrength is the tally magnitude, not a probability
Price-factor lean cohort-relative · momentum + low-vol
In the bottom 10% of small-caps on low-volatility.
Where this is validated: survivorship-free factor study (micro/small caps only), |t|>3.2. Cohort-relative ranking, not a price forecast or buy/sell advice. Calibration tracked live.
-2
net · balanced
0 bull / 1 bear factors
Factor breakdown 8 factors · signed points sum to net -2●
Analyst moves90d—
Earnings4 quarters—
Insider flow120d—
Estimate revisionsWeeks—
Sentiment1–30d—
Longer-horizon context weighs the read · not a 30-day timing call
Institutional (13F)Latest 13F—
1 institutional holder(s) added/opened last quarter (demoted — validated negative IC, not scored (QUANT_SIGNAL.md))
Quality / valueTTM-2 pts
weak Piotroski F-score (2/8)
Filing forensicsLatest FY—
filing forensics — possible channel-stuffing (receivables outrunning revenue) (demoted — settled NULL/wrong-signed, not scored (QTICK_FORMULA_AUDIT_2026_07.md))
Risk flagsDaily—
low gross profitability (bottom-quintile quality)
Net tally
-2
0 bull − 2 bear
Factors agreeing
0↑ 1↓
of 9 tracked
Read strength
balanced
30d horizon
Strongest factor
Quality / value
-2 pts
Model
QTick Engine
ORBS track record
Building
5 of 12 resolved
Forensic flags filing red flags · backtested edge where shown●
Revenue-timing languagerevenue-recognition timing language worth watching
Cannot-estimate contingencyan unquantified legal/regulatory contingency the company says it cannot estimate
Territory — competitor / supplier graph ●
SWPeer+1.9%
PKGPeer+0.6%
IPPeer+0.4%
AMCRPeer-0.2%
AMCCFPeer0.0%
-2 net
balanced
0 bull / 1 bear factors
Red-Flag X-Ray
Accounting quality · red-flag scan
One integrity score (0–100) from a set of accounting checks that look for red flags. Higher is safer — and we show the checks it passed, not just the ones it failed.
50
/ 100
Integrity score
D
1 critical · 2 watch · 1 clear of 4 scored tests
1 clear2 watch1 critical1 n/a
✓Clear
Bankruptcy distressZ 10.37●
Altman-Z in the Safe
!Watch
Earnings manipulationM 3.29●
Possible manipulation (m5 7/8)
–n/a
Leveragen/a●
Debt/equity not available
✕Critical
Profitability qualityF 2/9●
Piotroski F-score 2 of 9
!Watch
Filing forensics2 flag(s)●
2 filing red flag(s) on the latest 10-K
How we test · 7 forensic testsA clear result ships as openly as a flag — and the tests that don't fire are published in full. No survivorship bias.
Share dilution / SBC creepFires when shares outstanding rise materially or stock-based comp outpaces buybacks.
Distress (Altman-Z, negative equity)Fires on balance-sheet fragility. For banks we substitute regulatory capital (CET1).
Margin trajectoryFires on multi-quarter gross / operating margin erosion.
Going-concern languageNLP scan of filings for material-doubt or going-concern wording.
Filing timelinessFires on late / NT (non-timely) filings and restatements.
Insider selling into strengthFires on discretionary insider sells during price strength; 10b5-1 plans down-weighted.
Analyst-downgrade momentumFires on clusters of net downgrades and target cuts.
Odds & pullback risk
Setup & odds
Which way the next move is more likely to go — and how overstretched the price looks right now.
The readSkews downsidewhere it sitsuncalibrated prior · not a forecast
How the likely upside compares with the downside, and how stretched the price is — odds, not timing.
Upside vs downside · 12m ◐
Upside 37.3%62.7% Downside
Expected move · 1wk◐±—
Upside target◐$0.75 +4.4% · level, not a call
Invalidation / stop◐$0.69 -4.0% · level, not a call
Reward : risk◐1.1 : 1
BullClose above $1 opens continuation.
BaseChop between stop and target into the next catalyst.
BearA break of $1 invalidates the setup.
Pullback risk · experimental ◐
LowElevatedHigh
Historically, crypto names in this tape state saw a ≥20% pullback within 63 trading days in 82% of cases (n=1,452).
1.00×the segment norm — 82% saw a ≥20% pullback within 63dn=1,452 · observational
Resolved up vs down · 63d◐40% up · 60% down same historical group as the pullback read · 1,452 cases · flat outcomes count on neither side — a historical rate, not a call
Conditioned on◐ANY · ANY vol · ANY momentum the past setups matched against this one
- 1.00× the crypto unconditional rate
- tape state: bottoming
- price 2.2σ from its 20-day mean
In detail
How to read the odds
This is a historical rate, and an experimental one: across 25 years, stocks in the same state — same segment, same price phase, same volatility, same momentum — pulled back this often. The record is built from today's list of companies, so names that delisted along the way are missing and each stock's current segment is projected backward; the rates lean toward survivors until that rebuild lands. Compare the multiple against the segment rather than the bare percentage — recent years run higher than the full 25-year record. None of it predicts timing.
The structure under the price ●
Support band●$0.66 – $0.72 +0.7% from spot · level, not a call
pivot low●$0.73 basis
s1●$0.69 basis
~68%of bands like this held 21 days after a touch — about the same as any comparable support level. Structure, not a prediction.n=40,800 · observational
Bottom confirmation●4 of 6 signs in find-bottom score 60/100 — pinned to 0 until the checklist clears
Capitulation flush, then quiet●in
Selling volume dried up●in
A higher low printed●in
Back above the 20-day line●not yet
Momentum diverging up●not yet
Heaviest volume on an up day●in
85%of confirmed bottoming reads still saw a ≥10% drawdown inside the next quarter (25-year study) — confirmation marks a turn forming, not safety.n=1,203 · observational
Trend & technical structure
Trend & technicals
The price chart's vital signs, in plain English. Expand any row for what it actually means for you.
The readDowntrendwhere it sitsmoving-average posture · fact
Moving averages describe the direction; RSI and the bands describe how stretched the move is. Neither predicts the next one.
Average prices (the trend)
Price vs 200-day●-54.2%
Momentum, bands & levels
In detail
The simple version
When price sits aboveits averages with momentum rising, the trend is healthy. When RSI is near the extremes or the price looks "stretched," the move is overdone and often takes a breather. Think of these as a weather report — conditions, not instructions.
Do these patterns even work?
Derived · what patterns actually did
Every charting site detects the pattern. We publish what happened next — the forward win-rate and sample size at each horizon, including the famous patterns that historically meant nothing.
The readForward win-rates, with sample sizewhere it sits
How often each chart pattern was actually followed by a gain, and how many past cases that's based on — including famous ones that didn't work.
Each bar is the win-rate — how often the price was higher that many days after the pattern appeared. The line marks 50%, a coin flip: green beats it, red is worse than chance. Every bar is a platform-wide cohort base rateacross every stock that has shown this pattern (cohort record, not this ticker's own history alone).
Pattern10-day21-day63-day
DowntrendBelow a coin flip
forward win-rate46.9%n=1,231,607
forward win-rate47.2%n=577,208
forward win-rate47.4%n=182,081
slope -0.48 over 40 bars
Descending triangleBelow a coin flip
forward win-rate47.3%n=492,536
forward win-rate48.1%n=231,004
forward win-rate49.2%n=73,226
flat support, falling resistance
Cup and handleBelow a coin flip
forward win-rate46.0%n=676,679
forward win-rate46.5%n=317,821
forward win-rate46.9%n=101,501
U-base + small handle pullback
Bollinger squeezeBelow a coin flip
forward win-rate43.2%n=736,993
forward win-rate44.4%n=345,291
forward win-rate46.9%n=109,950
bands at a multi-month tight — breakout pending
Snapshot as of 2026-08-11
In detail
Why we show you the losers
Famous reversal signals like a bullish engulfing have historically closed higher less than half the time at short horizons — below a coin flip. We publish the win-rate and the sample size on every cohort, so a 42-case base rate never masquerades as an 8,500-case one. Objective base rates, not forecasts.
Momentum & performance
Momentum / performance
Trailing returns and relative strength versus the benchmark.
The readLaggardwhere it sitsRS percentile vs market
How the stock has returned, and whether it's beating the market. A strong run shows recent leadership — leadership reverses without warning.
Trailing returns
Relative strength vs S&P 500
24
RS-rank
percentile vs market
percentile vs market
Relative strength line (β-adj)◐-21.56
In detail
What relative strength tells you
A rank of 24 means ORBS has outpaced 24% of the market over the past year. That is what it has done, not a promise about what comes next — leadership can reverse without warning.
Risk profile
Risk
Volatility and sensitivity, regressed against SPY from adjusted bars — then the landmine check: what could actually go wrong here.
The readHigh drawdown riskwhere it sitsvs the px<$1 segment base rate · observational
Beta is how much it moves with the market; volatility and the worst drop show how rough the ride has been. Historical context, not a position-size rule.
87.5%6-month large-drawdown risk vs 25.6% for its segment
Beta · 1-year◐
5.27
more sensitive than market
Beta · 3-year◐
1.68
Realized vol · 30d◐
75.6%
annualized
Max drawdown · 1y●
-98.7%
The drawdown read · 6-month, segment-graded
Where it sits3.4×
LowHigh
vs the px<$1 segment base rate · observational
87.5%6-month large-drawdown risk, vs 25.6% for its segment
Max drawdown, trailing year●-0.99 driver
Distance from 52-week high●-0.99 driver
Parkinson range volatility●1.66 driver
Log price (level)●-0.32 driver
Observational 6-month large-drawdown risk ranking — not a forecast, not alpha. Historical distress rate for this px<$1 segment: 25.6%. This name reads 3.4× that base rate.
Tape state & tail · nightly, adjusted bars
bottoming0/100
SettledKnifing
State: bottoming — A basing/reversal pattern is printing: capitulation volume has dried and a higher low is in (confirmation 60%).
−20.7%a 1-in-200 day for this name — 0.1× what a normal curve expects
Cannot-estimate contingency●flagged
In detail
Reading risk
A beta of 5.27 means that, historically, a 1% move in the S&P has come with a ~5.27% move here. Realized vol ran 76% and the largest drawdown observed in the trailing year was 99% — both are what happened, not a bound on what can. The drawdown band above is observational — a risk sort against names of the same segment, blind to balance-sheet failures that never showed in the price.
How this kind of company fails
Failure modes · Crypto-equity
Different businesses break in different ways. This section reshapes by company type — these are the specific failure modes for a name like this one.
The readCrypto-equitywhere it sitsrouted by company type
Different company types fail in different ways — a bank runs on deposits, a hyper-growth name on its valuation. These are the specific ways a stock like this tends to break.
Premium to crypto NAV+70.2%
Market cap versus the marked value of the digital assets it holds. A large premium can collapse toward NAV when sentiment turns — the equity then falls faster than the underlying crypto.
Crypto beta0.48×
How much the equity moves for each move in the underlying coin (OLS of daily returns). A high beta means this trades as a leveraged crypto proxy, not an independent business.
↳ Failure modes are routed by company type (bank · growth · etc.), not a one-size scorecard. Observational.
How rates push this name
Derived · rates & regime
The 10-year yield is public. Its measured pull on this specific stock — and how it trades around the macro calendar — is the derived layer.
The readFalls with rateswhere it sitshow it moved when rates moved · extremes trimmed
How much this stock actually moves when interest rates move, and how it behaves around big economic releases.
Sensitivity to 10Y yield ●
Rates are a Falls with rates for this name
Observations●501 rolling window
Fit · r²●n/a
Measured across 501 daily moves against the 10-year Treasury yield (FRED DGS10). Where the company-level link is weak or the sample is short, we fall back to the sector average rather than print a number we don't trust.
Behaviour around the macro calendar ●
× = how much more this stock moves on each release day vs a normal day. Amber = outsized (≥1.4×). Context, not a directional call.
Volatility regime ◔
The volatility engine runs on market-wide risk channels, not on individual names, so there is no 1-year volatility percentile for this symbol. The realized-volatility and drawdown reads in the risk section are the per-name measures.
Valuation
Valuation
Is the stock cheap or expensive? Each multiple is graded and explained in plain English.
The readCoverage incompletewhere it sitsagainst its own 5-year range where we have it · standard bands otherwise
Price against earnings, sales, book value and cash flow. We mark the measures that don't apply rather than fake them.
What you pay for earnings
P/E (trailing)●Price ÷ last 12 months of profit; graded vs own 5y history when coveredn/an/a
Forward P/E●Price ÷ next year's expected profitn/an/a
PEG ratio◐Valuation set against expected growth — lower can look cheaper, but one cutoff is not a verdictn/an/a
Earnings yield◔Profit as a % of price, like a bond yield—n/a
Earnings yield − risk-free●Earnings yield minus the government-bond yield at the same daten/an/a
Dividend yield●Annual indicated cash dividend as a % of price0.00%Income
What you pay for the business
Price / Sales●Price ÷ annual revenue; graded vs own 5y history when coveredn/an/a
Price / Book◔Price ÷ net assets on the booksn/an/a
EV / EBITDA◔Whole-company value ÷ operating cash earningsn/an/a
EV / FCF◔Whole-company value ÷ positive free cash flown/an/a
Price / FCF◔Price ÷ free cash flow generatedn/an/a
FCF yield◔Free cash flow as a % of market valuen/an/a
P/E vs own 5y●Five-year median 38.7×n/an/a
P/S vs own 5y●Five-year median 0.1×89th pctn/a
EV/EBITDA and P/FCF need positive operating cash earnings to mean anything (and don't apply to banks, where leverage is the product) — so we mark them n/a rather than print a misleading number.
Peers today territory performance, for valuation context
SWPeer+1.9%
PKGPeer+0.6%
IPPeer+0.4%
AMCRPeer-0.2%
AMCCFPeer0.0%
Fundamentals
The business
Data not available.
Inventory ledger
The stockroom
Data not available.
Segments & geography
Where the revenue lives
Data not available.
Distance from insolvency
Derived · distance from default
Not the debt total — how far this company's asset value could fall before its debts get hard to cover, and how that distance ranks against its peers.
The read—where it sitspercentile vs solvency universe
How far the company sits from real financial distress, plus how it ranks against peers — more than a debt total tells you.
n/a
σ to default
n/amodel-implied probability of default ●
Filing-forensics flags
1/4
SafeGreyDistress
Model-implied, not a credit rating.It estimates how far the company's assets would have to fall before it couldn't cover its debts, using a standard model (Merton). Higher is safer. (risk-free rate n/a, one-year horizon, asset volatility from —)
Distance-to-default band ●
distress · 0cautionsafe8σ+
Debt-service capacity
Interest coverage●-14.0× operating income / absolute interest expense
Long-term debt / assets●n/a as filed; distinct from Merton D/V
In detail
How to read these two ratios
The credit engine uses the same stored thresholds shown here: coverage at or below 1× cannot cover interest, while 8× or more is its comfortable band; long-term debt at 10% of assets or less is its light band, while 60% or more is its heavy band. Missing XBRL tags stay n/a.
Altman solvency ●
Altman Z-Score●10.4 Safe
In detail
Why a percentile, not a number
The absolute Z-Score is shown whenever its filing inputs exist. The cross-sectional percentile is a separate field and stays n/a until a current universe rank is on file.
Forensic accounting ●
1Validated forensic-accounting flag fired. Individual flag details are not carried by this endpoint.
Are your shares being diluted?
Derived · ownership erosion
Raw share count is everywhere. The consequence — how fast the count is growing and where that ranks against peers — is the read that matters.
The read—where it sitsdilution percentile vs peers
How fast the share count is changing versus peers, with stock compensation, issuance and repurchases shown separately when covered.
5-year share-count CAGR ●
The CAGR needs annual filings roughly five years apart that both carry a share count. This name's filing history on file does not span that window, so no rate is published — the buyback and stock-comp rows below are measured independently and still hold.
Most-dilutive percentile vs peers
Peer percentile●n/a not covered
Stock comp / revenue◔0.1% latest fiscal year
Stock comp / OCF◔operating cash flown/a not covered
Gross buyback yield●+0.01% TTM repurchases / market value
Net buyback yield●-0.82% TTM repurchases minus issuance / market value
Diluted / basic share gap●n/a latest fiscal-year per-share overhang proxy
SBC trend◔falling up to five fiscal years
Shares outstanding · indexed 5y ●
Indexing needs an unbroken run of annual share counts across the same five-year window the CAGR uses. Where a year is missing — or the reported counts switch share class mid-series — the chart is withheld rather than drawn across the gap.
Analyst & estimates
The Street
Data not available.
How this name behaves into the print
Earnings habit
The street's consensus-surprise habit — whether estimates run conservative or aggressive against what the company reports, not management's own guidance — the beat streak graded against names with the same profile, and what the tape does on good news.
The readMixed habitwhere it sitsvalidated base rates · graded out-of-time
Whether the street sandbags this name, how often a beat streak like this persists (with its sample size), and what the tape does with good news.
62%of names with this beat profile beat againn=126,782 · observational
Consensus habit · trailing 8 quarters
Consensus-surprise habit●not management guidanceinsufficient surprise history
insufficient history (n=0 < 4)
62%of names that had this beat profile went on to beat again (cohort record, not this stock alone)n=126,782 · observational
insufficient history for a bucket — pooled base rate
survivor-tilted universe (currently-listed names; large-cap-skewed coverage)
What the tape does with it
Post-earnings tape●— no measured announcement reactions on file yet
Earnings-day move · typical●— needs ≥8 measured prints
Implied vs realized move●— insufficient options history
In detail
How to read the habit
This is a historical rate: among companies with the same recent beat record, that share beat again. It was checked on later periods than the ones it learned from, and against the plain long-run average. It describes the group, not this specific report.
Ownership & positioning
Ownership
Who holds it, how options lean, and the most recent insider, congressional and 13F transactions.
The read—where it sitspositioning band · not a vote
Who owns it and what insiders and big funds are doing. Steady buying reads positive; heavy selling reads cautious.
Holders
Institutional●24.9%
Insider●54.6%
Institutional flow●—
Fund concentration●—
Activist stake●None on file
Insider & short
Insider 90d net●—
10b5-1 vs discretionary◔scheduledMostly programmatic
Short interest · %float◔8.2%
Short interest · 30d Δ◔—
Options positioning
Put/call · OI●—
Put/call · volume●—
Implied move●next exp.±—
IV skew (25Δ)●—
In detail
Reading the positioning
Institutional flow data unavailable.
Recent transactions Form 4 + congressional●
FilerSourceActionValueDate
13F filers · last quarter ●
Renaissance TechnologiesAdded+0.6M sh · $1M
Conviction weighting, not a transaction list
Derived · who's actually buying
Insider buys are weighted by how senior the buyer is and whether several bought at once, alongside how fast big funds moved in or out quarter to quarter.
The read—where it sitscontinuing holders only — excludes new and exited funds
Insider buys, weighted by how senior the buyer is and whether several buy at once — plus how fast big funds are moving in or out.
How strong the insider buying is ●
5.0 / 18.44
018.44
Intensity index — explicitly not a probabilityDistinct exec buyers
0/3
Buy clusters · last 90d
90d agotoday
Fund holders · quarter on quarter ●
Net registered funds +2 this quarter
Continuing holders●Trimming on balance funds that held through both quarters
In detail
Reading the flow
No clustered executive buying this window. Among funds that held the name through both quarters, more trimmed than added. Separately, the registered-holder count moved +2 quarter-over-quarter (6 new, 4 exited). The two count different populations, so they can point opposite ways. Conviction is intensity, not a forecast.
Options
Options pressure
Data not available.
Gamma map
Coverage
Data not available.
Peers & supply chain
Territory · peers & supply chain
The names in this stock's orbit — how each is trading today, and how they wire together as suppliers, customers and competitors.
The readLagging groupfact
How nearby companies are trading. Moving with them is a sector story; breaking away is specific to this stock.
TickerRelationshipTodayRelative move
ORBSThis stock-1.16%
In detail
Lagging its peers
ORBS is -1.7% behind the peer average (+0.54%). Divergence from the group is where the stock-specific signal lives.
Supply map how the territory wires together●
suppliercustomercompetitor
Customer momentum
The customer chain
Data not available.
News & social
The story
Data not available.
What this name did from here
Time machine
Each look-back point: the price then, the move to today, and what was going on — earnings, corporate events, news flow.
The readLower than a year agofact
The price at each look-back point and the move to today, with what was happening at the time — the per-ticker face of the track record.
Look-backs · vs the $0.73 close of 2026-08-10
3 months ago●$0.87 -16.5% to today
6 months ago●$1.33 -45.3% to today
1 year ago●$1.48 -50.9% to today
3 years ago●$6.10 -88.1% to today
history starts 2023-06-01
In detail
Why we show the rear-view mirror
Every number on this page gets graded by what happens next. The time machine is the same idea pointed backwards: the state of this name at each past date and the move that followed, for any symbol — not a curated highlight reel.
The risk case
The case against
What can break: how hard this name has fallen before, a sensible position cap, whether it behaves like a lottery ticket, how much cash it has left, how it drifts after earnings, whether the dividend holds, and what changed in the filings — plus a crowding read when its three inputs agree.
The readCoverage incompletewhere it sitsan experimental model estimate · the history-based reads below are graded separately
The case against the stock: how hard it has fallen before, how much cash it has left, how it behaves after earnings, whether the dividend holds, what changed in the filings, and how crowded the trade is.
Avoid score · v2.1 isotonic model · experimental
The nightly batch has not scored this name yet — the model needs universe-wide ranking features that are not computed on demand.
Terminal fate · the cohort's ledger
Of 4640 small names tracked 2016-2026, 4.7% were delisted for cause within 24 months and 9.2% were acquired — historical frequencies for the cohort, not a forecast for this name.
Cohort●small 2016-2026
12m outcomes●for-cause 1.8% [1.6%–2.0%] acquired 4.8% [4.5%–5.1%] · still listed 93.2% · n=4857
24m outcomes●for-cause 4.7% [4.2%–5.1%] acquired 9.2% [8.6%–9.8%] · still listed 85.5% · n=4640
36m outcomes●for-cause 7.0% [6.4%–7.6%] acquired 13.4% [12.5%–14.3%] · still listed 78.8% · n=4480
In detail
Reading the fate ledger
Each row is what happened to every tracked name in this size cohort over that window — delisted for cause, acquired, or still listed — with the band around each rate. These are the cohort's historical frequencies, not probabilities for this name, and the acquisition arm is never an acquisition forecast.
Deep-drawdown recovery record
5.2%of small names 90% or more below their prior high reclaimed it within 3 years, counting the delisted as never-recovered — an upper bound, since still-open episodes are excludedn=649 · observational
Names this size that fell 90% took a median 517 trading days to reclaim their prior high — and only 5.2% did within 3 years once the delisted are counted (a survivor-only screen would claim 9.3%).
This name's drawdown●-98.4% crossed the −90% bucket · vs the trailing 3y high
Survivor-only view●9.3% the illusion gap is 4.1% — what dropping the delisted flatters the odds by
Median recovery●517 trading days among the names that did recover
Sub-$1 close on record
Closed below $1.00 for 35 consecutive sessions - past the 30-session threshold exchanges use in listing-compliance rules.
Run●35 sessions below $1.00 latest close $0.73 · NasdaqCM · as of 2026-08-10
Max defensible position size
No matching cell in the position-sizing grid for this name's cohort.
Lottery profile
No cohort reference sample on file for this name's size segment.
Cash runway
No fundamentals row on file for this name.
Post-earnings drift
No measured first-day earnings reaction on file, so drift cannot be graded.
Dividend reliability
No dividend on file — trap / covered classification does not apply.
Filing restatements · trailing 2 years
Restatements on file●2 latest: 2024-09-30
Filings here were later materially revised. Historically, flagged quarters restated at 34.0% vs 5.5% unflagged (6.2x).
34.0%restatement rate for flagged quarters — reference sample count not stored
Unflagged rate●5.5% baseline for quarters without restatements
Relative rate●6.2× flagged vs unflagged quarters
In detail
What a restatement means here
A restatement means a filing was later materially revised — not necessarily fraud, but a signal the original numbers were unreliable. Historically, quarters flagged here were restated at 34.0% vs 5.5% — 6.2× the unflagged rate.
Calibration scorecard
Auditable track record
Every rating we publish is fingerprinted, tracked, and resolved in public. Here's how we've actually done.
12
calls logged
track record builds as calls resolve (5/8)
track record builds as calls resolve (5/8)