Everything behind the call on Moncler S.p.A. 6 sections, ordered the way risk stacks up: survival first, quality and price in the middle, context last. The Beacon gives you the read. This is where you check the work.
The five reads
Global tape
No overseas listings — MONRF trades on its home exchange only.
The bottom linestart hereAs of 2026-09-18
Chart pattern
Below both averages
The 50-day sits below the 200-day
50-day $56.92 · -11.5% 200-day $60.20 · -16.4%
Earnings
In 152 days
18 Feb 2027
cohort P(beat) 61% · n=139,757
Dividend
3.22%
Forward annual yield at today's price
Risk flags
None flagged
5 checks run, 5 clear
beta 0.37 · vol 47% ann. worst drawdown -29%
New to this? Every metric carries a plain-English read beside it, and an ⓘ next to a label opens the definition. Anything unfamiliar is also defined at the foot of the page under Glossary.
In one paragraphwhat the company actually does215 chars
Moncler S.p.A., together with its subsidiaries, engages in the production and distribution of garments, children's clothing, footwear, eyewear and other related accessories under the Moncler and Stone Island brands.
↳ Plain EnglishBefore anything else: can this company pay its bills? These blocks check the balance sheet, whether your slice of ownership is being diluted, and whether the accounting looks honest.
Piotroski F-score
F 7/9CLEAR
Piotroski F-score 7 of 9. Nine pass/fail tests covering profitability, leverage and operating efficiency; seven or more is strong.
Balance sheetSep 19, 2026
Solvency and liquidity ratios
Current ratioshort-term assets against short-term bills2.42×healthy >2
Debt / equityborrowings against shareholder capital0.29
Net cashcash on hand in excess of every borrowing$97.82M
Your ownership stake
Share-count growth vs peersLOW DILUTION
41st pctile
Where this name's share-count growth ranks among peers. Lower is less dilutive.
Accounting forensicsSEC filings
Red-flag x-rayGRADE A
100 / 100
0 critical · 0 watch · 5 clear of 5 scored tests
5 of 5 checks clear
Red-flag x-ray · every check, passes included
CheckStatusValueWhat it looks for
Bankruptcy distressCLEARZ 6.73Altman-Z in the Safe · fundamentals
Earnings manipulationCLEARM -2.81M-score in range · fundamentals
Profitability qualityCLEARF 7/9Piotroski F-score 7 of 9 · fundamentals
Filing forensicsCLEAR0 flagsno filing red flags on the latest 10-K · forensic
5 checks, 5 clear. The passes are shown because a score built from five checks means something different from one built from three.
02Refreshed · Sep 19, 2026GOOD · 63/100
Business quality
20% net margin, 16% return on equity, +1% revenue growth, and capital earning 18% against a 7% cost.
↳ Plain EnglishMargins tell you how much of each sales dollar the company keeps. Return on capital tells you whether reinvesting that money creates value. Both are read against what the filings support, not against a target.
Quality score
63 / 100GOOD
Profitability · net margin 20%
Growth · revenue +1% YoY
Balance strength · debt/equity 0.29
Profitability, growth and balance strength scored separately, then blended.
ProfitabilityRefreshed · Sep 19, 2026
Net marginOF EVERY SALES DOLLAR
20.0%
The share of revenue that survives every cost and becomes profit.
Gross marginPRICING POWER
78.1%
What is left of a sales dollar before overhead — the clearest read on pricing power.
Operating marginAFTER RUNNING COSTS
29.2%
What survives the cost of running the whole business.
Return on equityPER $1 OF EQUITY
16.3%
Annual return on each dollar of shareholder equity.
ROIC − WACC spreadCREATES VALUE
10.8pp
Earns 18% on invested capital that costs about 7%. A positive spread means every retained dollar compounds rather than leaks.
Incremental ROIC (3y)ON NEW CAPITAL
2.0%
The return on capital put to work over the last three years — a sharper read than the trailing average, because it prices the newest decisions.
Growth & relative strength
Trailing return by period
1 month
-13.1%
3 months
-19.1%
6 months
-19.3%
Year to date
-27.5%
1 year
-14.6%
Revenue growth (YoY)GROWING
+0.8%
Revenue against the same period a year ago.
EPS growth (YoY)IN LINE
-2.4%
Earnings per share against a year ago. Running ahead of revenue means margins are widening.
12-1 momentumEX LAST MONTH
+1.1%
Return over the last year excluding the most recent month — the standard momentum factor, which drops the short-term reversal.
Relative-strength rankBOTTOM 24%
24 / 100
Where this name's 3-month return against the S&P 500 ranks across the market — a quarter's standing, not the year's.
Typical earnings moveData unavailableRealized move magnitudes are not published for this name yet — no measured print on file.
Reaction: beat vs missData unavailableThe beat-versus-miss reaction gap is not computed for this name — undetermined — needs ≥12 measured beats.
Consensus biasVALIDATED
Persistent
insufficient surprise history
Next reportIN 152 DAYS
18 Feb 2027
Reports amc · revenue 629.9 M
Dividends & income
Dividend yieldforward annual
3.22%
The cash return the payment alone provides at today's price.
Cash coveragefree cash flow
>2x
Whether the payment is funded out of the cash the business generates.
Inventory ledger
Data unavailableNo inventory detail is tagged in this company's filings. The ledger needs the XBRL inventory components, which a business without physical goods does not report.
Segments & geography
Data unavailableRevenue by segment and region is not on file for this name, so product and geographic concentration are not shown.
↳ Plain EnglishA multiple is what the market charges for a dollar of this company's earnings, cash or revenue; the trend and the options tape say what the price is doing around it. Together they are the timing picture, not the quality one.
Trend
Below every average0 OF 3 AVERAGES
50-day $56.92 · 200-day $60.20. Price above both is the structural definition of an uptrend.
The setup right now
Price · 504 sessions2024-09-13 → 2026-09-17
price50-day200-day
How to read this
Down 5.82% on the session.
Follow the solid line: each point is a session close. Compare it to the 50-day average — while price stays above it the short-term trend is up, and a drop below is the first structural warning.
Market cap$13.42B
Day range$49.33 – $50.35
Above 52-week low+2%
Realized volatility47% ann.
Worst drawdown-29.0%
Momentum (RSI-14)COOL
32
030 oversold70 hot100
Where momentum sits on a 0–100 scale. Above 70 is overbought, below 30 oversold; the middle says the move has room either way.
Typical day (ATR-14)±2.3%
$1.17
The average true range — how far this stock moves on an ordinary day. It sets the scale a stop has to clear.
MACDBELOW SIGNAL
-0.41
The short-term trend against its own signal line. The sign is the read; the size is not a target.
Bollinger position13% OF RANGE
Lower band
Where price sits inside its own volatility band. The edges are where a move is stretched, not where it reverses.
20-day VWAPPRICE BELOW
$51.51
The volume-weighted average of the last month. Price above it means recent buyers are, on average, in profit.
Chandelier exitBROKEN
$53.25
A volatility-based trailing stop, set a few average ranges below the recent high.
18 Feb 2027 · in 152 daysNext earningsThe next scheduled catalyst. The forward guide usually moves the tape more than the printed number. Date as the vendor last stated it on 24 Jul; companies confirm about three weeks ahead, so it can still move.
2026-09-25 · in 6 daysConsumer SentimentA scheduled macro release. It moves this stock independently of anything the company does.
Setup & oddsNightly
Pullback riskoverstretch read
High1.32× segment rate · n=394
Historically, large names in this tape state saw a ≥10% pullback within 63 trading days in 88% of cases (n=394).
Overstretchvs the 20-day mean
-1.9σ
How many standard deviations price sits from its 20-day mean. Beyond 2σ is genuinely stretched; inside it is ordinary.
Bottom zoneif it breaks down
$33 – $341 support
Where prior demand appeared: Evt 1m q95 at $33.86.
Slide scorefalling-knife check
100 / 100Falling knife
A composite of consecutive down days, gap risk and volume expansion. Low means any decline is orderly.
Valuation
Earnings yield vs cashABOVE CASH
0.44pp
The earnings yield clears the risk-free rate, so the current return alone competes with cash.
Net cash per shareCASH BACKING
$0.36
Cash less every borrowing, per share. It is the part of the price that is not a claim on future profits.
Multiples
Trailing P/Eearnings already reported18.6×
Price / salesprice against revenue, before any of it becomes profit4.3×
Price / bookprice against the accounting value of the assets3.5×
EV / EBITDAthe multiple an acquirer would pay10.5×
EV / free cash flowenterprise value against the cash the business throws off18.0×
FCF yieldfree cash flow per dollar of market value5.52%
0 of the 6 priced multiples above sit in the richer half of its band. Each priced multiple is read against this stock's own history where a five-year range is on file, so the question is whether today is dear for this name rather than for the market. The multiples are computed separately from the quote above and are not re-priced as it moves, so they can lag it.
Price horizon & timingSep 18, 2026
Entryzone of evt 1m q95
$34.45Approach
Where the composer's entry sits, on its own stated basis.
TargetSma 50 + vwap 50
$56.88$57–$57
A zone, not a price. It is where the composer expects supply, not a forecast.
Stop2× ATR below entry
$32.11risk $2.34/sh
The level that says the setup is wrong, on the basis named beside it.
Risk / rewardtarget vs stop
9.59:1
Reward against risk on the composer's own levels.
Measure from a price$
To the 50-day
+13.0%
short-term trend line · $56.92
To the 200-day
+19.6%
primary trend line · $60.20
To the composer's target
+13.0%
Sma 50 + vwap 50 · set Sep 18, 2026 · $56.88
To the composer's stop
-36.2%
2× ATR below entry · set Sep 18, 2026 · $32.11
To the 52-week high
+39.2%
highest print of the past year · $70.09
To the 52-week low
-2.0%
lowest print of the past year · $49.33
A typical day (ATR)
$49.18 – $51.52
±$1.17 average true range
Type any price to re-measure every distance from it. Each row is a level this page already states somewhere else, so nothing here is a new number — and none of it is a recommendation to trade at that price.
Signal
The levels line up.
Entry $34.45 · stop $32.11 · target $56.88, a 9.59:1 ratio. The composer flagged: fair-value reference.
Gamma map
Data unavailableThis name has no listed options chain, so there is no dealer gamma to map. Regime, flip level, walls and the implied move all need a chain to exist.
Options tape
Data unavailableNo options chain is connected for this ticker. Max pain, the put/call ratio, the implied move and the open-interest ladder all need the chain feed.
0413F quarterly · Form 4 dailyNET SIGNAL +2
Ownership & flow
Institutions hold 56%.
↳ Plain EnglishWho is buying and selling, and what they had to disclose. Institutions file 13F 45 days after quarter end, executives file Form 4 within two days, and Congress discloses under the STOCK Act with a 30–45 day legal lag. Every one of those is a look backwards.
Net signal
+2BALANCED · 30d
Quality / value +2
1 bull / 0 bear factors. The points sum to the net beside the label; nothing here is weighted after the fact.
The QTick signalNightly
Quality / valueTTM · CONTEXT
+2
strong Piotroski F-score (7/9)
Signal
1 bull / 0 bear factors
Independent factors scored and netted to +2 over 30d, a balanced reading. 1 of 9 factors carried a direction; the others scored zero and do not vote. The signal describes where the data leans, not what to do about it.
Cross-category read
Data unavailableFewer independent evidence families are ready than the engine's minimum, so there is nothing to check for agreement. A cross-category read over two categories is not a read.
Wall Street
Data unavailableNo sell-side firm publishes research on this name. There is no consensus rating, no price target and no estimate revisions to weigh — for a company this size that is the norm rather than a gap in our data.
Who owns it13F quarterly · Form 4 daily
Institutional ownershipRETAIL-HEAVY
56.5%
The share held by 13F filers. It describes last quarter's positioning, not today's — filings land up to 45 days after quarter end.
Insider ownershipOFFICERS & DIRECTORS
18.2%
The share held by the people running the company.
Free float83% OF SHARES
225.90M
Shares actually available to trade, excluding insider and restricted holdings.
Dollar volume (ADV)21st PCTILE
$59,413/day
Average dollars traded per day, and where that ranks cross-sectionally. Thin liquidity is a cost you pay on the way out, not just on the way in.
Borrow feeData unavailableWe do not license securities-lending data, so the annualized cost of borrowing shares to short is not something we can show. Short interest and days-to-cover above are the closest read we can source.
The story · news & sentimentRolling window
Why it moved on Sep 18, 2026NONE
-5.82%
MONRF fell −5.82% since the last close — no identified catalyst in our coverage.
Matched · Sep 18, 2026
Congress
Data unavailableNo congressional trades in this name have been disclosed under the STOCK Act. Lawmakers' disclosed trades cluster heavily in large caps, so an empty list is the usual state.
050 graded callsHIGH VOLATILITY
Risk & track record
Beta 0.37, 47% annual volatility, a -29% worst drawdown, and 3 of 8 risk surfaces clear.
↳ Plain EnglishWhat owning it does to a portfolio, what the model votes against, and how often our own calls have been right. Every call is graded when it resolves, and the ones still open stay visible.
A very bad day (EVT)
−19.5%1-IN-200 DAY
Fitted to the tail of the return distribution rather than assuming a bell curve. Size the position so a day like this is survivable.
What it does to a portfolio5-year window
Beyond the tail (ES)1-IN-1,000 DAY
−45.3%
The average loss on a 1-in-1,000 day or worse — deeper in the tail than the 1-in-200 figure above and further than the measured history reaches, so it reads as the scale of a crash, not a forecast of one.
Tail understatementHEAVY TAIL
2.1×
A normal-curve estimate understates this name's worst days by about 2.1×, so volatility alone is the wrong risk measure for it.
Max drawdownWORST FALL
-29.0%
The deepest peak-to-trough fall in the measured window. Only hold a position you can watch do this.
Beta (vs the market)LOW FIT
0.37
The market explains about 1.1% of its daily moves, so this beta says little about how it tracks the index — most of its movement is its own.
3-year beta 0.47
Annualized volatilityELEVATED
47%
How far it swings over a year, from its own realized returns.
Tactical phaseNIGHTLY READ
Falling knife
Selling pressure65
Buying pressure0
Overheat0
State: falling_knife — Still breaking lower without consolidation — a fresh swing-low printed and no basing pattern has formed yet.
0-100 · high = active · lit = the engine's own phase, cohort-banded
What votes against
Data unavailableNo factor in the model currently votes against this name. That is a statement about the model's inputs today, not a claim that nothing could go wrong.
Failure modes · by company type
Data unavailableFailure modes are routed per company type, and only the bank-run and crypto-treasury rulebooks are validated so far. This name routes as growth, so there is no cohort-specific checklist to run. A generic list would read as analysis without being any.
The risk case · why not to buy8 surfaces · nightly
Suggested position capmax defensible size
3.2%tail cap binds
max defensible size 3.2% - tail binds
Avoid score6-month distress
6.2%0.8× its cohort · thinnest-traded micro-caps
Observational 6-month large-drawdown risk ranking — not a forecast, not alpha. Historical distress rate for this thinnest-traded micro-caps segment: 7.8%. This name reads 0.8× that base rate.
LowDistress screenThe distress model did not score this name in the latest run, so this surface is unmeasured rather than clear.Not scored
MedPosition size, not conviction, is the binding constrainthalf-Kelly 53.5% · tail cap 3.2% · category cap 90.1%. The tail cap binds, so 3.3% is the number (n=15,197). We show which one binds rather than the friendliest.Sizing
LowLottery-ticket behaviourIts best 21-day return sits at 7.0% against a 8.7% cohort 90th-percentile threshold — below the line where forward returns have historically turned negative.Behaviour
LowPost-earnings driftNo measured earnings reaction on file, so the drift surface is unmeasured.Not scored
LowDividend riskNot scored for this name.Not scored
LowRestatement historyFiling history is not deep enough to check for restatements.Not scored
LowCrowded shortNot in a warn state: the crowded-short model only publishes when short interest and thin liquidity coincide, and neither condition is met here.Not scored
Signal
3 of 8 surfaces clear.
8 surfaces checked, 3 clear. The binding constraint is position size — the tail cap is the one that binds. Each row states which surface it is and what it measured; a surface that could not be scored says so rather than counting as clear.
Who should skip it
Data unavailableNone of the skip conditions can be evaluated for this name yet — they each need a measured drawdown, beta, yield or scheduled report to key off.
Our track record0 resolved
Track recordBUILDING IN THE OPEN
4 logged
4 calls logged on this name, 0 resolved so far. Calls are logged the moment they are made, so the open ones are public before anyone knows how they turn out, and a hit-rate is not published until enough of them resolve.
0 resolved · 4 open
Calls on MONRFTHIS NAME
4
This name's own call count. Too few have resolved to publish a rate over them, so none is shown rather than a rate over 0.
0610-K disclosed linksAPPAREL MANUFACTURING
The wider context
5 mapped peers, 3 connections.
↳ Plain EnglishCompanies do not trade alone. This is the peer set, the supply chain that has to deliver, and the macro variables that move the stock regardless of company news.
Rate sensitivity
-8.1% per +1ppSECTOR
This is the SECTOR prior, not a measurement of this name — the regression did not clear its own bar. The verdict beside it (headwind) comes from the prior too, so the two agree by construction rather than by evidence.
Versus peersLatest session
Peer set · 5 names
SymbolRelationshipPriceSession
HMRZFPeer$18.560.00%
RLPeer$335.10+0.61%
GILPeer$46.87+1.30%
LEVIPeer$19.82-0.15%
VFCPeer$12.79-1.08%
The mapped peer set and how each traded in the latest session. A peer moving with this name says the move is the sector's; one moving against it says the move is this company's.
Look-back returns describe what happened, not what is likely. They are here to set the scale a future move would be measured on.
Historical retrospective. Context, not a forecast.
Macro driversRolling window
Next macro catalystIN 6 DAYS
Consumer Sentiment
2026-09-25. A scheduled release that moves this stock independently of anything the company does.
Events · what moves this stockSep 12, 2026
Retail salesUsually helps when shoppers spend more than expected
This report is the sector's own sales figure, printed monthly.
Typical for the Consumer Cyclical sector
On the day -0.2% · A week later +0.8% · Two weeks later -0.1% · Rose on 7 of 39 report days
Across the last 39 Retail sales reports since Jun 15, 2023, MONRF moved -0.2% on average on the day and was 0.1% lower two weeks later. The S&P 500 moved +0.1% on those days.
Fewer paychecks means less spending at stores, restaurants and dealers.
Typical for the Consumer Cyclical sector
On the day +0.1% · A week later +0.2% · Two weeks later +0.1% · Rose on 28 of 169 report days
Across the last 169 Initial jobless claims reports since Jun 8, 2023, MONRF moved +0.1% on average on the day and was 0.1% higher two weeks later. The S&P 500 moved 0.0% on those days.
Housing startsUsually helps when more homes are started than expected
Homebuilders and home-improvement chains sit in this sector.
Typical for the Consumer Cyclical sector
On the day -0.2% · A week later -0.6% · Two weeks later -2.2% · Rose on 4 of 39 report days
Across the last 39 Housing starts reports since Jun 20, 2023, MONRF moved -0.2% on average on the day and was 2.2% lower two weeks later. The S&P 500 moved 0.0% on those days.
Industrial productionUsually helps when factory output comes in stronger than expected
A stronger economy means more consumer spending.
Typical for the Consumer Cyclical sector
On the day -0.2% · A week later +0.8% · Two weeks later -0.1% · Rose on 7 of 39 report days
Across the last 39 Industrial production reports since Jun 15, 2023, MONRF moved -0.2% on average on the day and was 0.1% lower two weeks later. The S&P 500 moved +0.1% on those days.
Higher prices squeeze household budgets and higher rates make borrowing dearer; both are bad for stores, restaurants and carmakers.
Typical for the Consumer Cyclical sector
On the day +0.2% · A week later +1.5% · Two weeks later +0.8% · Rose on 8 of 39 report days
Across the last 39 Producer prices (PPI) reports since Jun 12, 2023, MONRF moved +0.2% on average on the day and was 0.8% higher two weeks later. The S&P 500 moved +0.3% on those days.
On the day -0.7% · A week later -0.5% · Two weeks later -1.1% · Rose on 3 of 38 report days
Across the last 38 Consumer sentiment (UMich) reports since Jun 26, 2023, MONRF moved -0.7% on average on the day and was 1.1% lower two weeks later. The S&P 500 moved 0.0% on those days.
Higher prices squeeze household budgets and higher rates make borrowing dearer; both are bad for stores, restaurants and carmakers.
Typical for the Consumer Cyclical sector
On the day -0.4% · A week later -1.2% · Two weeks later -1.1% · Rose on 4 of 38 report days
Across the last 38 Core PCE (the Fed's gauge) reports since Jun 28, 2023, MONRF moved -0.4% on average on the day and was 1.1% lower two weeks later. The S&P 500 moved +0.2% on those days.
Higher prices squeeze household budgets and higher rates make borrowing dearer; both are bad for stores, restaurants and carmakers.
Typical for the Consumer Cyclical sector
On the day +0.2% · A week later +1.6% · Two weeks later +0.9% · Rose on 7 of 38 report days
Across the last 38 Core inflation (core CPI) reports since Jun 12, 2023, MONRF moved +0.2% on average on the day and was 0.9% higher two weeks later. The S&P 500 moved +0.3% on those days.
Customer momentum
Data unavailableCustomer momentum needs listed customers that disclose a revenue dependence on this company, and none is on file. The connections below are a different map: competitors and partners, most of them curated rather than filed.
Connections3 links · none confirmed
Direct connections · 3 edges
CompanyRelationSessionProvenance
FDX · Suppliersupplier-0.73%Rumored · manual
AMZN · Customercustomer+1.00%Rumored · manual
TGT · Competitorcompetitor-1.03%Rumored · manual
0 of 3 edges are named in a filing; the rest come from reporting we have not matched to one yet, and are labelled as such.