No overseas listings — TECK trades on its home exchange only.
Track record · free & ungated
We grade our price-band calls in public
Each forward price band is logged the day it's set and scored when it resolves — misses included. None are due yet, so there's no hit-rate to show: this builds in the open, not behind the paywall.
3
bands logged
0
resolved so far
Building
status
The calibration ledger stays free, always — a track record can't sit behind a paywall.
Price action
Price & quote
Live quote refreshed every 15 minutes against the full daily snapshot.
The readUnder pressurefact
Where the price sits inside today's range and its 52-week range, plus how it's performed over time. This is the raw quote — the same number everywhere, just faster.
Tap & drag the chart for daily OHLCV · 0 sessions · prev close $63.54 (dashed)
Open●
$65.59
Prev close●
$63.54
Volume●
1.09M
avg 3.73M
Rel. volume◐
0.29×
below normal
Market cap●
$33.24B
Shares out●
481.98M
float 466.75M
Day range
$64.96$68.21
52-week range ◐
$30.98$68.21
-13.7% from high+89.9% above low
The QTick signal
QTick proprietary signal
A transparent point tally — bull evidence minus bear evidence — read over ~30 days. Faster factors time the swing; slower ones (quality, 13F, forensics) weigh in as longer-horizon context. A model-based prior, not advice.
~30-day swing read · graded vs S&Puncalibrated prior · track record buildingstrength is the tally magnitude, not a probability
Price-factor lean — not shown at this market cap (these factors carry no validated edge above small-cap).
Where this is validated: survivorship-free factor study (micro/small caps only), |t|>3.2. Cohort-relative ranking, not a price forecast or buy/sell advice. Calibration tracked live.
Bullish
+6
net · moderate
Factor breakdown 8 factors · signed points sum to net +6●
Analyst moves90d—
Earnings4 quarters+3 pts
latest EPS beat by 56%
Insider flow120d—
Estimate revisionsWeeks—
Sentiment1–30d—
Longer-horizon context weighs the read · not a 30-day timing call
Institutional (13F)Latest 13F+1 pts
2 institutional holder(s) added/opened last quarter
Quality / valueTTM+2 pts
strong Piotroski F-score (8/9)
Filing forensicsLatest FY—
Risk flagsDaily—
Net tally
+6
6 bull − 0 bear
Factors agreeing
3↑ 0↓
of 9 tracked
Read strength
moderate
30d horizon
Strongest factor
Earnings
+3 pts
Model
QTick Engine
TECK track record
Building
0 of 3 resolved
Forensic flags filing red flags · backtested edge where shown●
No filing red flags in the latest fiscal year.
Territory — competitor / supplier graph ●
Section readQTICK net read
n/a
Bullish
uncalibrated prior · not a forecast
Our overall read, built from every factor above and shown with the full breakdown. Research, never advice.
Red-Flag X-Ray
Accounting quality · red-flag scan
One integrity score (0–100) from a set of accounting checks that look for red flags. Higher is safer — and we show the checks it passed, not just the ones it failed.
How we test · 7 forensic testsA clear result ships as openly as a flag — and the tests that don't fire are published in full. No survivorship bias.
Share dilution / SBC creepFires when shares outstanding rise materially or stock-based comp outpaces buybacks.
Distress (Altman-Z, negative equity)Fires on balance-sheet fragility. For banks we substitute regulatory capital (CET1).
Margin trajectoryFires on multi-quarter gross / operating margin erosion.
Going-concern languageNLP scan of filings for material-doubt or going-concern wording.
Filing timelinessFires on late / NT (non-timely) filings and restatements.
Insider selling into strengthFires on discretionary insider sells during price strength; 10b5-1 plans down-weighted.
Analyst-downgrade momentumFires on clusters of net downgrades and target cuts.
Section readRed-Flag X-Ray
B
integrity 0–100 · 7-test battery
One integrity score (0–100) from a set of accounting checks. 80+ is clean; a 'watch' item is minor; a 'critical' flag is serious.
Odds & pullback risk
Setup & odds
Which way the next move is more likely to go — and how overstretched the price looks right now.
The read—where it sitsuncalibrated prior · not a forecast
How the likely upside compares with the downside, and how stretched the price is — odds, not timing.
Upside vs downside · 12m ◐
Upside/downside split not available
Expected move · 1wk◐±—
Upside target◐$63.95 +8.7% · level, not a call
Invalidation / stop◐$62.79 +6.7% · level, not a call
Reward : risk◐-1.3 : 1
BullClose above $64 opens continuation.
BaseChop between stop and target into the next catalyst.
BearA break of $63 invalidates the setup.
Pullback risk ◐
LowElevatedHigh
Historically, large names in this tape state saw a ≥10% pullback within 63 trading days in 86% of cases (n=1,727).
1.30×the segment norm — 86% saw a ≥10% pullback within 63dn=1,727 · observational
Conditioned on◐neutral · high vol · pos momentum the matched historical cell
1.30× the large unconditional rate
tape state: neutral
↳ In detail
How to read the odds
This is an empirical base rate: across 25 years of point-in-time history, stocks in this same state (segment, tape phase, volatility, momentum) pulled back this often. The multiple against the segment norm is the comparable number — recent-era levels run hot versus the long grid, so weight the multiple over the bare %. It doesn't predict timing. Research, never advice.
Trend & technicals
The trend read
Data not available.
ProPattern outcomes · derived analysisunlocked
Do these patterns even work?
Derived · what patterns actually did
Every charting site detects the pattern. We publish what happened next — the forward win-rate and sample size at each horizon, including the famous patterns that historically meant nothing.
The readForward win-rates, with sample sizewhere it sits
How often each chart pattern was actually followed by a gain, and how many past cases that's based on — including famous ones that didn't work.
Each bar is the win-rate — how often the price was higher that many days after the pattern appeared. The line marks 50%, a coin flip: green beats it, red is worse than chance.
Pattern10-day21-day63-day
UptrendBelow a coin flip
forward win-rate46.7%n=679,452
forward win-rate47.2%n=662,969
forward win-rate48.5%n=624,036
slope +0.11 over 40 bars
Hanging manBelow a coin flip
forward win-rate47.0%n=91,895
forward win-rate48.4%n=90,106
forward win-rate50.4%n=84,904
long lower shadow, small body at top
Head and shouldersBarely beats chance
forward win-rate48.9%n=292,578
forward win-rate50.6%n=287,365
forward win-rate52.1%n=267,512
head above two ≈-equal shoulders — bearish reversal
Double bottomBelow a coin flip
forward win-rate48.0%n=739,861
forward win-rate49.3%n=728,124
forward win-rate51.9%n=683,778
two troughs ≈ equal — reversal if neckline breaks
Descending triangleBelow a coin flip
forward win-rate46.2%n=305,804
forward win-rate47.6%n=300,906
forward win-rate49.5%n=278,065
flat support, falling resistance
Bollinger squeezeBelow a coin flip
forward win-rate40.9%n=461,545
forward win-rate42.5%n=454,588
forward win-rate46.8%n=431,523
bands at a multi-month tight — breakout pending
↳ In detail
Why we show you the losers
Famous reversal signals like a bullish engulfing have historically closed higher less than half the time at short horizons — below a coin flip. We publish the win-rate and the sample size on every cohort, so a 42-case base rate never masquerades as an 8,500-case one. Objective base rates, not forecasts.
Momentum
Is it leading?
Data not available.
Risk
How bumpy
Data not available.
Failure modes
QTick
Data not available.
ProMacro sensitivity · derived analysisunlocked
How rates push this name
Derived · rates & regime
The 10-year yield is public. Its measured pull on this specific stock — and how it trades around the macro calendar — is the derived layer.
The readTECK: no robust price-measured macro sensitivity yet — sector lean: Materials are commodity-linked and tend to benefit when inflation runs hot.where it sitsrate-beta · winsorized
How much this stock actually moves when interest rates move, and how it behaves around big economic releases.
Sensitivity to 10Y yield ●
Per +1% in the 10Y yield-7.1%
−120+12
Rates are a TECK: no robust price-measured macro sensitivity yet — sector lean: Materials are commodity-linked and tend to benefit when inflation runs hot. for this name
Observations●500 rolling window
Fit · r²●n/a
OLS of daily returns on changes in FRED DGS10 over 500 observations. Low-confidence betas (short N or weak r²) defer to a sector prior rather than print a spurious number.
Behaviour around the macro calendar ●
CPI · vs a typical day0.0×
NFP · vs a typical day0.0×
PCE · vs a typical day0.0×
× = how much more this stock moves on each release day vs a normal day. Amber = outsized (≥1.4×). Context, not a directional call.
Volatility regime ●
GARCH vol · annualized●—
Vol percentile · 1y●n/a
Valuation
Valuation
Is the stock cheap or expensive? Each multiple is graded and explained in plain English.
The readFairwhere it sitsmultiple percentile vs S&P
Price against earnings, sales, book value and cash flow. We mark the measures that don't apply rather than fake them.
Reasonably valuedTrades at undemanding multiples relative to its earnings and book value — undemanding on valuation alone. Cheap ≠ a buy.
What you pay for earnings
P/E (trailing)●Price ÷ last 12 months of profit24.9×Fair
Forward P/E●Price ÷ next year's expected profit22.6×Fair
PEG ratio◐P/E adjusted for growth — under 1 is cheapn/an/a
Earnings yield◔Profit as a % of price, like a bond yield4.02%Fair
Dividend yield●Annual cash paid to holders, % of price0.63%Income
What you pay for the business
Price / Sales◔Price ÷ annual revenue3.1×Fair
Price / Book◔Price ÷ net assets on the books1.32×Cheap
EV / EBITDA◔Whole-company value ÷ operating cash earnings9.1×Cheap
Peers today territory performance, for valuation context
Section readValuation
Fair
multiple percentile vs S&P
Price against earnings, sales, book value and cash flow. We mark the measures that don't apply rather than fake them.
Fundamentals & quality
Fundamentals / quality
How good is the underlying business? Scale, profitability and balance-sheet strength, graded.
The readSolidwhere it sitspercentile vs sector
Scale, profitability and balance sheet. Growing revenue, widening margins and clean returns mean a durable business.
Solid fundamentalsHealthy profitability and a sound balance sheet, growing at a steady pace.
Scale & growth
Revenue · TTM◔Total sales over the last 12 months$10.76BScale
EPS · TTM◔Profit earned per share$2.83Profit
Net margin◔Cents of profit kept per $1 of sales13.0%OK
Revenue growth◔Sales vs a year ago+18.7%Strong
EPS growth◔Profit-per-share vs a year ago+262.8%Strong
Margin trajectory◔Are profit margins widening or shrinking?n/an/a
Returns & balance sheet
ROE◔Profit generated on shareholders' equity5.6%Weak
ROIC◔Return on all invested capital3.4%Weak
Gross / Op margin◔Profitability before & after operating costs25% / 14%Weak
Free cash flow◔Cash left after running & investing$-583.00MWeak
Debt / Equity◔Borrowings vs equity — lower is safer0.38Strong
Current ratio◔Can it cover near-term bills? Over 1.5 is healthy2.54Strong
Section readQuality
Solid
percentile vs sector
Scale, profitability and balance sheet. Growing revenue, widening margins and clean returns mean a durable business.
ProCredit & safety · derived analysisunlocked
Distance from insolvency
Derived · structural default
Not the debt total — the model-implied distance from default. A two-equation structural model solved per name, plus a cross-sectional solvency rank.
The readSolventwhere it sitspercentile vs solvency universe
How far the company sits from real financial distress, plus how it ranks against peers — more than a debt total tells you.
6.21
σ to default
0.00%model-implied probability of default ●
Validated structural flags
0/4
SafeGreyDistressAltman n/a
Model-implied, not a credit rating.It estimates how far the company's assets would have to fall before it couldn't cover its debts, using a standard model (Merton). Higher is safer. (r = n/a, T = 1y, asset vol from —)
Distance-to-default band ●
distress · 0cautionsafe8σ+
Altman solvency — peer rank ●
Not applicable. Altman Z-Score isn't defined for this business type. The Merton dial above still resolves.
Forensic accounting ●
.
.
ProDilution radar · derived analysisunlocked
Are your shares being diluted?
Derived · ownership erosion
Raw share count is everywhere. The consequence — how fast the count is growing and where that ranks against peers — is the read that matters.
The readBuying backwhere it sitsdilution percentile vs peers
How fast the share count is growing versus peers. Buybacks help you; heavy stock-based pay dilutes you.
5-year share-count CAGR ●
Buyback — count shrinking-167.0%/yr
−100+10
Most-dilutive percentile vs peers
Peer percentile●n/a not covered
Stock-comp % of revenue◔n/a not covered
Shares outstanding · indexed 5y ●
5y ago = 10095.1
↳ In detail
What the radar is saying
The count is shrinking167.0% a year via buybacks — accretive: each share you hold becomes a slightly bigger slice. Research, never advice.
Analyst & estimates
The Street
Data not available.
ProEarnings bias · derived analysisunlocked
How this name behaves into the print
Earnings habit
The street's guidance habit, the beat streak graded against names with the same profile, and what the tape does on good news.
The readMixed habitwhere it sitsvalidated base rates · graded out-of-time
Whether the street sandbags this name, how often a beat streak like this persists (with its sample size), and what the tape does with good news.
62%of names with this beat profile beat againn=100,632 · observational
Consensus habit · trailing 8 quarters
Guidance habit●insufficient surprise history
insufficient history (n=0 < 4)
62%of names that had this beat profile went on to beat again (cohort record, not this stock alone)n=100,632 · observational
insufficient history for a bucket — pooled base rate
Post-earnings tape●— no measured announcement reactions on file yet
Implied vs realized move●— insufficient options history
↳ In detail
How to read the habit
The beat probability is an empirical base rate — names with this trailing profile beat again that share of the time, graded out-of-time against climatology. It is a cohort fact, not a forecast of this specific print. Research, never advice.
Smart money & positioning
Smart money
Who holds it, how options lean, and the most recent insider, congressional and 13F transactions.
The read—where it sitspositioning band · not a vote
Who owns it and what insiders and big funds are doing. Steady buying reads positive; heavy selling reads cautious.
Holders
Institutional●0.8%
Insider●0.0%
Institutional flow●—
Fund concentration●—
Activist stake●None on file
Insider & short
Insider 90d net●—
10b5-1 vs discretionary◔scheduledMostly programmatic
Short interest · %float◔—
Short interest · 30d Δ◔—
Options positioning
Put/call · OI●—
Put/call · volume●—
Implied move●next exp.±—
IV skew (25Δ)●—
↳ In detail
What positioning is whispering
Institutional flow data unavailable.
Recent transactions Form 4 + congressional●
FilerSourceActionValueDate
Rep. Jonathan JacksonHouse · CongressSell$15,001 - $50,00023 Jul
Rep. Jonathan L. JacksonHouse · CongressBuy$15001-$5000009 Jul
13F gurus · last quarter ●
Renaissance TechnologiesAdded+0.2M sh · $10M
Bridgewater Associates (Ray Dalio)Added+0.0M sh · $1M
Greenlight Capital (David Einhorn)Added+1.6M sh · $66M
ProSmart-money flow · derived analysisunlocked
Conviction, not just transactions
Derived · who's actually buying
Anyone can list the filings. We weight insider buys by cluster and seniority into a conviction intensity, and read institutional footprint as a velocity.
The readFunds trimmingwhere it sitsintensity, not a probability
Insider buys, weighted by how senior the buyer is and whether several buy at once — plus how fast big funds are moving in or out.
Insider conviction intensity ●
Clustered exec buys · n/an/a / 18.44
018.44
Intensity index — explicitly not a probability
Distinct exec buyers
n/a
Buy clusters · last 90d
90d agotoday
Institutional footprint · QoQ ●
+2new fundsexited−33
Net registered funds -31 this quarter
Institutional velocity●Trimming
↳ In detail
What the flow is saying
No clustered exec buying this window — conviction reads low. Funds are trimming: a net -31 registered holders quarter-over-quarter. Conviction is intensity, not a forecast.
Who the revenue depends on — and what their stocks just did
Customer chain
Revenue-dependency percentages from the company's own filings, the dependency-weighted move of those customers, and the suppliers exposed to this name.
The readOthers depend on itfact
Who this company's revenue depends on — percentages from its own SEC filings — and what those customers' stocks did over the past month. Suppliers historically follow their customers with a lag.
Disclosed customers · from this company’s filings
Customer concentration●— no disclosed customer-concentration edges for this symbol
Who depends on this stock
HL8.2% of its revenue filed 2022 · aged — may have ended
RGLD8.2% of its revenue filed 2024
+0.58%/mohistorical top−bottom tercile spread sorting suppliers by their customers' dependency-weighted move (2013-01 .. 2026-01, 58% positive months, 607 disclosed edges) — a group fact, not this stock's forecastn=135 · observational
Historical, point-in-time backtest of a cross-sectional screen (135 months, 2013-2026), gross of trading costs. The equal-weighted base effect is marginal (t 1.84); statistical significance relies on the dependency weighting (t 2.02). Validated on monthly rebalancing; served daily on the same 21-bar horizon. This is a research screen describing a group-level historical spread - not a forecast of any individual stock's return.
↳ In detail
How to read the chain
The percentages are the company’s own concentration disclosures — a customer at 40% of revenue matters roughly eight times one at 5%, and the move shown weights them that way. Suppliers historically follow their customers with a lag; the lead-lag gap shows how much of the customers’ move this stock has not yet matched. Research, never advice.
News & social
The story
Data not available.
What this name did from here
Time machine
Each look-back point: the price then, the move to today, and what was going on — earnings, corporate events, news flow.
The readHigher than a year agofact
The price at each look-back point and the move to today, with what was happening at the time — the per-ticker face of the track record.
Look-backs · vs $65.37 today
3 months ago●$58.89 +11.0% to today
6 months ago●$43.30 +51.0% to today
1 year ago●$37.05 +76.4% to today
3 years ago●$40.96 +59.6% to today
history starts 2023-06-01
↳ In detail
Why we show the rear-view mirror
Every number on this page gets graded by what happens next. The time machine is the same idea pointed backwards: the state of this name at each past date and the move that followed, for any symbol — not a curated highlight reel.
Why not to buy
The case against
Data not available.
Calibration scorecard
Auditable track record
Every rating we publish is fingerprinted, tracked, and resolved in public. Here's how we've actually done.
3
calls logged track record builds as calls resolve (0/8)
Resolved●
0
awaiting first results
Open calls●
3
tracked, unresolved
TECK track record●
building
published once resolved
Section readTrack record
Building
Our public hit-rate, misses included — a track record only means something if it can't be cherry-picked.